Concept 5: Cost of equity.
by J Victor on February 8th, 2012In concept 4, towards the end, I gave a hint on what cost of equity is all about. It is the rate of returns expected by an investor. A decision to invest is made only if the current market price of a share is consistent with its likely return.
What is it?
Cost of equity is the rate of return that an investor expects when he invests in a company. This rate of return has two components
 Dividends expected from the investment and
 Capital appreciation.
For example –let’s assume that an investor expects 15 % return from a stock that pays 3 % dividend yield. That means, the capital appreciation expected by him is 12%. The total return from that stock will be 12 % + 3% = 15%.
Getting closer
Let’s take a closer look at the above mentioned return of 15%. If the investor has targeted a 15% return, it simply means that 15% returns is enough for him to compensate for–
 The risk he takes for investing in stock market
 The risk he takes for investing in this particular stock and
 The return he forgoes on a risk free investment alternative.
Why cost of equity matters
 An investor would expect his equity investments to grow by at least the cost of equity;
 Cost of equity can be used as the discount rate to be used in stock valuation models like discounted cash flow or DCF.
In general, Cost of equity can be calculated in two ways. First method is called the dividend growth method or Gordon’s method and the second one is called the CAPM (discussed in concept 4 while discussing risk premium)
Gordon’s method
The traditional method to calculate cost of equity is the dividend capitalization model which is as follows: (also called Dividend growth model)
 Expected Dividend Per Share / Market Price + Expected Growth rate of dividends
The only way to find the expected dividend rate is by relying the past dividend history and also by listening to what the management of the company hints about the future dividend payment. It worth noting here that –
 One, past history is no guarantee that future results will follow the trend and,
 Two, the management is often very optimistic about the future prospects of their business. So the expected dividend should be calculated on a conservative mode.
The Gordon’s model assumes that the company has an infinite life, a constant dividend growth rate and a constant rate of return. It also assumes that the company has only equity and retained earnings to finance its business.For example , if the current stock price of a company is Rs 1000, the expected dividend yield for the next period is 3% and the expected growth rate in earnings and dividends in the long term is 10% then cost of equity would be calculated as follows:
 Cost of equity = Expected Dividend Per Share / Market Price + Expected Growth rate of dividends
 Cost of equity = 3% + 10% = 13%
If the risk free rate is 7%, the equity risk premium would be 6%. The method is simple and straight forward but it does not apply to companies that do not pay dividends.
From Cost of equity to Cost of Capital
In fact this cost of equity is just one part of a concept called ‘cost of capital’. Equity is one part of the capital that the company uses; the other part is called ‘debt’. When you add up the cost of equity and debt, you get the cost of capital.
What’s worth to note is that the proportion of equity and debt content in the capital structure of a company would not be equal. Secondly, the debt portion may carry a cost which is already fixed and the equity portion may carry a cost which depends on the riskreturn trade off.
So to bring everything to balance, we compute the overall cost of capital called the weighted average cost of capital. (WACC)
WACC.
Weighted average cost of capital is not an easy measure to compute. It’s the total of
 Cost of equity and cost of debt.
 Cost of equity may have to be calculated using CAPM or any other approach. The cost of debt is pretty straight it’s the cost that the company is paying for its debt funds. Since the company can deduct the cost of debt from its revenues (interest is an expense) the resultant tax benefit too, has to be taken into account. so the actual cost of debt would be interest paid less the tax savings resulting from the taxdeductible interest payment.
 Falling interest rates results in a reduction of the WACC while frauds, scams , market speculation and volatility results in investors demanding more to park their funds in equities and therefore would increase the WACC.
WACC as an Investment Tool
WACC is a valuable tool to make investment decisions. The WACC is the minimum rate of return at which a company produces value for its investors. For example, let’s say a company generates a return of 15% and has a WACC of 7%. That means that the company generates a value of 8% (157) for investors in that company.
WACC can also be used as the discount rate in discounted cash flow valuation method – for valuation purposes. Even small changes in WACC may cause significant change in DCF.
I’ll discuss more about DCF method of valuation in later stages
That’s about cost of equity and capital concept.
In our next post , we discuss an important topic on valuation estimating the EPS growth rate.
You may like these posts:
Leave a Comment
Beginner's Lessons
 Point Blank
 Financial Discipline for all.
 Investing Basics
 Shares & Stock Markets
 Introduction to Financial Statements
 Financial ratios.
 Stock investing strategies
 Technical Analysis I
 Technical analysis II
 Before Picking up stocks..
 Choosing a Broker and opening Demat Accounts
 Make your debut !!
 More ... from stock markets.
 Valuation of shares
 Futures and Options  The basics.

Most Recent
 The week ahead: Macro data to guide the markets…
 The week ahead: US fed meet and macroeconomic data to move the markets..
 The week ahead: Q4 results and FIIs will be the key drivers.
 The week ahead : Q4 results and global cues to drive the markets..
 The week ahead : Nearing key hurdles..
 The week ahead : Bearish sentiments to continue ..
1 Response to “Concept 5: Cost of equity.”
Ritesh sawarkar
March 18, 2016 at 12:06 pm
Too….good explanation…